A note on the empirical comparison of RBG and Ludii

10/01/2019
by   Jakub Kowalski, et al.
0

We present an experimental comparison of the efficiency of three General Game Playing systems in their current versions: Regular Boardgames (RBG 1.0), Ludii 0.3.0, and a Game Description Language (GDL) propnet. We show that in general, RBG is currently the fastest GGP system. For example, for chess, we demonstrate that RBG is about 37 times faster than Ludii, and Ludii is about 3 times slower than a GDL propnet. Referring to the recent comparison [An Empirical Evaluation of Two General Game Systems: Ludii and RBG, CoG 2019], we show evidences that the benchmark presented there contains a number of significant flaws that lead to wrong conclusions.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/29/2019

An Empirical Evaluation of Two General Game Systems: Ludii and RBG

Although General Game Playing (GGP) systems can facilitate useful resear...
research
11/04/2021

Optimised Playout Implementations for the Ludii General Game System

This paper describes three different optimised implementations of playou...
research
06/15/2020

Efficient Reasoning in Regular Boardgames

We present the technical side of reasoning in Regular Boardgames (RBG) l...
research
05/01/2022

The Ludii Game Description Language is Universal

There are several different game description languages (GDLs), each inte...
research
06/08/2017

Regular Boardgames

We present an initial version of Regular Boardgames general game descrip...
research
03/06/2020

Experimental Studies in General Game Playing: An Experience Report

We describe nearly fifteen years of General Game Playing experimental re...
research
11/04/2019

"Predicting" after peeking into the future: Correcting a fundamental flaw in the SAOM – TERGM comparison of Leifeld and Cranmer (2019)

We review the empirical comparison of SAOMs and TERGMs by Leifeld and Cr...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset