A Note on the Concrete Hardness of the Shortest Independent Vectors Problem in Lattices

05/24/2020
βˆ™
by   Divesh Aggarwal, et al.
βˆ™
0
βˆ™

BlΓΆmer and Seifert showed that 𝖲𝖨𝖡𝖯_2 is NP-hard to approximate by giving a reduction from 𝖒𝖡𝖯_2 to 𝖲𝖨𝖡𝖯_2 for constant approximation factors as long as the 𝖒𝖡𝖯 instance has a certain property. In order to formally define this requirement on the 𝖒𝖡𝖯 instance, we introduce a new computational problem called the Gap Closest Vector Problem with Bounded Minima. We adapt the proof of BlΓΆmer and Seifert to show a reduction from the Gap Closest Vector Problem with Bounded Minima to 𝖲𝖨𝖡𝖯 for any β„“_p norm for some constant approximation factor greater than 1. In a recent result, Bennett, Golovnev and Stephens-Davidowitz showed that under Gap-ETH, there is no 2^o(n)-time algorithm for approximating 𝖒𝖡𝖯_p up to some constant factor Ξ³β‰₯ 1 for any 1 ≀ p β‰€βˆž. We observe that the reduction in their paper can be viewed as a reduction from 𝖦𝖺𝗉3𝖲𝖠𝖳 to the Gap Closest Vector Problem with Bounded Minima. This, together with the above mentioned reduction, implies that, under Gap-ETH, there is no 2^o(n)-time algorithm for approximating 𝖲𝖨𝖡𝖯_p up to some constant factor Ξ³β‰₯ 1 for any 1 ≀ p β‰€βˆž.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset