A Framework for Non-Monotonic Reasoning About Probabilistic Assumptions

by   Marvin S. Cohen, et al.

Attempts to replicate probabilistic reasoning in expert systems have typically overlooked a critical ingredient of that process. Probabilistic analysis typically requires extensive judgments regarding interdependencies among hypotheses and data, and regarding the appropriateness of various alternative models. The application of such models is often an iterative process, in which the plausibility of the results confirms or disconfirms the validity of assumptions made in building the model. In current expert systems, by contrast, probabilistic information is encapsulated within modular rules (involving, for example, "certainty factors"), and there is no mechanism for reviewing the overall form of the probability argument or the validity of the judgments entering into it.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8

page 9


An Application of Non-Monotonic Probabilistic Reasoning to Air Force Threat Correlation

Current approaches to expert systems' reasoning under uncertainty fail t...

A Method for Integrating Utility Analysis into an Expert System for Design Evaluation

In mechanical design, there is often unavoidable uncertainty in estimate...

Incidence Calculus: A Mechanism for Probabilistic Reasoning

Mechanisms for the automation of uncertainty are required for expert sys...

A Model for Non-Monotonic Reasoning Using Dempster's Rule

Considerable attention has been given to the problem of non-monotonic re...

Implementing Probabilistic Reasoning

General problems in analyzing information in a probabilistic database ar...

Optimal discovery with probabilistic expert advice: finite time analysis and macroscopic optimality

We consider an original problem that arises from the issue of security a...

Extending Term Subsumption systems for Uncertainty Management

A major difficulty in developing and maintaining very large knowledge ba...