A Discrimination Report Card

06/22/2023
by   Patrick Kline, et al.
0

We develop an Empirical Bayes grading scheme that balances the informativeness of the assigned grades against the expected frequency of ranking errors. Applying the method to a massive correspondence experiment, we grade the racial biases of 97 U.S. employers. A four-grade ranking limits the chances that a randomly selected pair of firms is mis-ranked to 5 explaining nearly half of the variation in firms' racial contact gaps. The grades are presented alongside measures of uncertainty about each firm's contact gap in an accessible rubric that is easily adapted to other settings where ranks and levels are of simultaneous interest.

READ FULL TEXT

page 38

page 42

research
10/03/2015

It is not all downhill from here: Syllable Contact Law in Persian

Syllable contact pairs crosslinguistically tend to have a falling sonori...
research
07/21/2023

A reduced basis method for frictional contact problems formulated with Nitsche's method

We develop an efficient reduced basis method for the frictional contact ...
research
07/15/2019

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement

We develop tools for utilizing correspondence experiments to detect ille...
research
06/29/2018

Revealing subgroup structure in ranked data using a Bayesian WAND

Ranked data arise in many areas of application ranging from the ranking ...
research
11/23/2019

SemEval-2013 Task 4: Free Paraphrases of Noun Compounds

In this paper, we describe SemEval-2013 Task 4: the definition, the data...
research
09/18/2023

Predictive Uncertainty-based Bias Mitigation in Ranking

Societal biases that are contained in retrieved documents have received ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset