A different perspective on a scale for pairwise comparisons

08/05/2015
by   J. Fueloep, et al.
0

One of the major challenges for collective intelligence is inconsistency, which is unavoidable whenever subjective assessments are involved. Pairwise comparisons allow one to represent such subjective assessments and to process them by analyzing, quantifying and identifying the inconsistencies. We propose using smaller scales for pairwise comparisons and provide mathematical and practical justifications for this change. Our postulate's aim is to initiate a paradigm shift in the search for a better scale construction for pairwise comparisons. Beyond pairwise comparisons, the results presented may be relevant to other methods using subjective scales. Keywords: pairwise comparisons, collective intelligence, scale, subjective assessment, inaccuracy, inconsistency.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/24/2015

Pairwise Comparisons Rating Scale Paradox

This study demonstrates that incorrect data are entered into a pairwise ...
research
05/20/2015

Managing Null Entries in Pairwise Comparisons

This paper shows how to manage null entries in pairwise comparisons matr...
research
10/28/2021

IMDB-WIKI-SbS: An Evaluation Dataset for Crowdsourced Pairwise Comparisons

Today, comprehensive evaluation of large-scale machine learning models i...
research
02/07/2018

When condition of order preservation is met?

The article shows a relationship between inconsistency in the pairwise c...
research
12/11/2017

A practical guide and software for analysing pairwise comparison experiments

Most popular strategies to capture subjective judgments from humans invo...
research
12/27/2016

Monte Carlo Sort for unreliable human comparisons

Algorithms which sort lists of real numbers into ascending order have be...
research
05/11/2020

Comparing three groups

We revisit simple and powerful methods for multiple pairwise comparisons...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset