A Defect in Dempster-Shafer Theory

02/27/2013
by   Pei Wang, et al.
0

By analyzing the relationships among chance, weight of evidence and degree of beliefwe show that the assertion "probability functions are special cases of belief functions" and the assertion "Dempster's rule can be used to combine belief functions based on distinct bodies of evidence" together lead to an inconsistency in Dempster-Shafer theory. To solve this problem, we must reject some fundamental postulates of the theory. We introduce a new approach for uncertainty management that shares many intuitive ideas with D-S theory, while avoiding this problem.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

research
05/16/2003

Clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence

In this paper we develop a method for clustering belief functions based ...
research
11/09/2018

Mathematical Theory of Evidence Versus Evidence

This paper is concerned with the apparent greatest weakness of the Mathe...
research
03/27/2013

On Some Equivalence Relations between Incidence Calculus and Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence

Incidence Calculus and Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence are both theor...
research
09/01/2023

Sherlock Holmes Doesn't Play Dice: The significance of Evidence Theory for the Social and Life Sciences

While Evidence Theory (Demster-Shafer Theory, Belief Functions Theory) i...
research
07/14/2012

Approximated Computation of Belief Functions for Robust Design Optimization

This paper presents some ideas to reduce the computational cost of evide...
research
06/20/2018

Approximation by filter functions

In this exploratory article, we draw attention to the common formal grou...
research
10/18/2018

Visions of a generalized probability theory

In this Book we argue that the fruitful interaction of computer vision a...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset