A Comparison of Static, Dynamic, and Hybrid Analysis for Malware Detection

03/13/2022
by   Anusha Damodaran, et al.
0

In this research, we compare malware detection techniques based on static, dynamic, and hybrid analysis. Specifically, we train Hidden Markov Models (HMMs ) on both static and dynamic feature sets and compare the resulting detection rates over a substantial number of malware families. We also consider hybrid cases, where dynamic analysis is used in the training phase, with static techniques used in the detection phase, and vice versa. In our experiments, a fully dynamic approach generally yields the best detection rates. We discuss the implications of this research for malware detection based on hybrid techniques.

READ FULL TEXT

page 14

page 15

page 17

research
01/06/2019

Malware Detection Using Dynamic Birthmarks

In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of dynamic analysis techniqu...
research
07/04/2021

Machine Learning for Malware Evolution Detection

Malware evolves over time and antivirus must adapt to such evolution. He...
research
07/17/2023

Hidden Markov Models with Random Restarts vs Boosting for Malware Detection

Effective and efficient malware detection is at the forefront of researc...
research
11/08/2021

OMD: Orthogonal Malware Detection Using Audio, Image, and Static Features

With the growing number of malware and cyber attacks, there is a need fo...
research
12/01/2020

Classifying Malware Using Function Representations in a Static Call Graph

We propose a deep learning approach for identifying malware families usi...
research
11/25/2022

Fast and Efficient Malware Detection with Joint Static and Dynamic Features Through Transfer Learning

In malware detection, dynamic analysis extracts the runtime behavior of ...
research
06/27/2022

Multifamily Malware Models

When training a machine learning model, there is likely to be a tradeoff...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset