A Comparison of Decision Analysis and Expert Rules for Sequential Diagnosis

by   Jayant Kalagnanam, et al.

There has long been debate about the relative merits of decision theoretic methods and heuristic rule-based approaches for reasoning under uncertainty. We report an experimental comparison of the performance of the two approaches to troubleshooting, specifically to test selection for fault diagnosis. We use as experimental testbed the problem of diagnosing motorcycle engines. The first approach employs heuristic test selection rules obtained from expert mechanics. We compare it with the optimal decision analytic algorithm for test selection which employs estimated component failure probabilities and test costs. The decision analytic algorithm was found to reduce the expected cost (i.e. time) to arrive at a diagnosis by an average of 14 Sensitivity analysis shows the results are quite robust to inaccuracy in the probability and cost estimates. This difference suggests some interesting implications for knowledge acquisition.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8


Rule Based Expert System for Cerebral Palsy Diagnosis

The use of Artificial Intelligence is finding prominence not only in cor...

Uncertainty Management for Fuzzy Decision Support Systems

A new approach for uncertainty management for fuzzy, rule based decision...

Adaptive Learning Expert System for Diagnosis and Management of Viral Hepatitis

Viral hepatitis is the regularly found health problem throughout the wor...

Towards a Normative Theory of Scientific Evidence

A scientific reasoning system makes decisions using objective evidence i...

Sequential Diagnosis by Abstraction

When a system behaves abnormally, sequential diagnosis takes a sequence ...

A Method for Integrating Utility Analysis into an Expert System for Design Evaluation

In mechanical design, there is often unavoidable uncertainty in estimate...