A comparison of classical and variational autoencoders for anomaly detection

09/29/2020

∙

This paper analyzes and compares a classical and a variational autoencoder in the context of anomaly detection. To better understand their architecture and functioning, describe their properties and compare their performance, it explores how they address a simple problem: reconstructing a line with a slope.

READ FULL TEXT

A comparison of classical and variational autoencoders for anomaly detection

Hierarchical Conditional Variational Autoencoder Based Acoustic Anomaly Detection

Anomaly Detection With Conditional Variational Autoencoders

Weakly supervised marine animal detection from remote sensing images using vector-quantized variational autoencoder

Challenges for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Particle Physics

Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Echocardiograms with Dynamic Variational Trajectory Models

Variational Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection in Respiratory Sounds

Including Sparse Production Knowledge into Variational Autoencoders to Increase Anomaly Detection Reliability

A comparison of classical and variational autoencoders for anomaly detection

Related Research

Hierarchical Conditional Variational Autoencoder Based Acoustic Anomaly Detection

Anomaly Detection With Conditional Variational Autoencoders

Weakly supervised marine animal detection from remote sensing images using vector-quantized variational autoencoder

Challenges for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Particle Physics

Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Echocardiograms with Dynamic Variational Trajectory Models

Variational Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection in Respiratory Sounds

Including Sparse Production Knowledge into Variational Autoencoders to Increase Anomaly Detection Reliability