A Bidirectional Fabric-based Pneumatic Actuator for the Infant Shoulder: Design and Comparative Kinematic Analysis

This paper presents the design and assessment of a fabric-based soft pneumatic actuator with low pressurization requirements for actuation making it suitable for upper extremity assistive devices for infants. The goal is to support shoulder abduction and adduction without prohibiting motion in other planes or obstructing elbow joint motion. First, the performance of a family of actuator designs with internal air cells is explored via simulation. The actuators are parameterized by the number of cells and their width. Physically viable actuator variants identified through the simulation are further tested via hardware experiments. Two designs are selected and tested on a custom-built physical model based on an infant's body anthropometrics. Comparisons between force exerted to lift the arm, movement smoothness, path length and maximum shoulder angle reached inform which design is better suited for its use as an actuator for pediatric wearable assistive devices, along with other insights for future work.

READ FULL TEXT VIEW PDF

page 3

page 6

02/16/2018

Design and Development of Effective Transmission Mechanisms on a Tendon Driven Hand Orthosis for Stroke Patients

Tendon-driven hand orthoses have advantages over exoskeletons with respe...
12/06/2017

A Systematic Approach For Kinematic Design Of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeletons

Kinematic structure of an exoskeleton is the most fundamental block of i...
04/18/2018

Design, Simulation, and Testing of Laika, a Quadruped Robot with a Flexible Actuated Spine

Walking quadruped robots face challenges in positioning their feet and l...
11/27/2021

Spine-like Joint Link Mechanism to Design Wearable Assistive Devices with Comfort and Support

When we develop wearable assistive devices comfort and support are two m...
03/05/2021

Compact pneumatic clutch with integrated stiffness variation and position feedback

Stiffness variation and real-time position feedback are critical for any...
03/19/2019

Fabric Soft Poly-Limbs for Physical Assistance of Daily Living Tasks

This paper presents the design and development of a highly articulated, ...

I Introduction

Though typically developing infants move their arms and explore their environment from the first months of age, infants with or at risk for upper extremity (UE) impairments show delayed emergence of UE motor milestones, and/or diminished ability to perform motor actions [Lobo2015CharacterizationInfancy]. Providing infants with opportunities for training through the use of assistive devices can lead to improvements on their motor function [Henderson2008]. Currently, UE assistive devices for infants are limited [Arnold2020ExploringReview.] and are mainly passive (notable examples are the Pediatric Wilmington Robotic Exoskeleton, a rigid 3D-printed, two-link device [Babik2016]; and, PlaySkin Lift, a soft wearable with mechanical inserts [Lobo2016PlaySkin]). Actuated devices, however, can deliver targeted and on-demand assistive forces that could directly adapt to the user as they grow and their abilities change [Sugar2007] (e.g., compared to the need for manual adjustment of mechanical assistance, as seen in [Babik2016, Lobo2016PlaySkin]). Our recent work on the development of an actuated UE wearable device for infants has utilized silicone-based pneumatically-controlled actuators to provide assistance at both elbow and shoulder joints [Kokkoni2020_asme]. The current paper extends this work by introducing new soft actuator designs for the shoulder joint.

Soft materials and compliant structures are increasingly being used for actuation in assistive and rehabilitation devices [Polygerinos2013, Maeder-York2014, Polygerinos2015, Park2014, Yap2017, Nguyen2019]. To be functional and practical, soft robotic actuators need to meet certain design specifications, such as high power density, accuracy and repeatability in both manufacturing and performance [Laschi2013, Iida2011, Agarwal2016, Majidi2014]. Soft pneumatic actuators are lightweight, have simpler control specifications, and provide inherent safety (i.e. low risk of getting injured in case of malfunction) over other complex engineered devices [Xiong2020]. Commonly used soft pneumatic actuators are Elastic Inflatable Actuators (EIAs), which include silicone-based EIAs and fabric-based EIAs, among others.

EIAs are powered by pressurized gas (or liquid) and are capable of achieving large strokes with very little friction, thus exhibiting distributed force generation [Gorissen2017]. Compared to silicone-based EIAs, fabric-based EIAs require lower pressure because of the non-extensibility of the fabric material. Also, fabric-based EIAs can be built faster and at a lower overall cost than silicone-based ones. Fabrication of the latter involves several steps that may take hours to complete: 3D printing molds for different parts (e.g., 1.5 hrs [Yang2017], etc.), multi-staged casting and curing of silicone (e.g., 0.5-16 hrs for DragonSkin, etc.), and assembling parts using suitable adhesives. On the other hand, fabric-based soft pneumatic actuators, such as those made of flexible Thermoplastic PolyUrethane (TPU) coated nylon fabric, can be built fast, in a cost-effective manner, and without the use of any specialized equipment [Low2017]. Even fabric-based actuators with complicated designs (e.g., use of pleats on the actuator to guide motion during inflation [Sanan2014], application of double-layered inner bladders to prevent air-leakage [Best2015], fabrication of wrinkle actuators using specialized equipment like high-frequency electromagnetic welding [Park2020], etc.) that do require significant fabrication time, may still be made faster than their silicone counterparts with similar functionality.

Fabric-based shoulder actuators are seen in UE devices intended for use by adults [Simpson2017, Simpson2020], and children [Li2019DesignExoskeleton] but not infants (exception is [Paez2021] which contains underarm actuators for the purpose of assisting postural transitions from lying to sitting). In this work, we explored the use of fabric-based EIAs as an alternative to the silicon-based EIAs previously used for our application [Kokkoni2020_asme].

Ii Fabrication Process, Design Considerations, and Preliminary Feasibility in Simulation

A new family of flexible TPU fabric-based, multi-pouched actuators for shoulder abduction/adduction is presented. Initially, first-principles-based numerical simulation was conducted to determine the preliminary feasibility of all proposed actuator variants prior to physical testing. Down-selected actuator variants were then fabricated and tested on a custom-built physical infant model.

Ii-a Design Approach

The design of our proposed fabric-based actuators with air pouches (cells) (Fig. 1) improves upon the design of the silicone-based shoulder actuators in [Kokkoni2020_asme]. The new actuators are low-profile (i.e. non-obtrusive when not inflated) and can be fabricated fast (20 min). We use flexible and lightweight fabric (Oxford 200D heat-sealable coated fabric [properties listed in Table I]). The fabric can be heat-sealed via non-specialized equipment like a household iron. To reduce areas that may become potential leakage points, we cut strips of fabric, wrap them around, and seal together the two opposite coated sides (instead of cutting two separate pieces and seal them at their periphery). This can constrain potential leakage to the point where tubing is embedded into a cell.

Elastic Modulus 498000000
Poisson’s Ratio 0.35
Shear Modulus 184400000
Mass Density 757.58
Tensile Strength 17520
Compressive Strength 103421000
Yield Strength 58605000
Thermal Expansion Coefficient 1.00E-06
Thermal Conductivity 0.53
Specific Heat 1386
TABLE I: Nylon-Oxford Fabric Properties

We focused on the design of rectangular actuators (Fig. 1). The actuators contain non-inflatable and inflatable portions, and are parameterized based on three characteristics: i) their total length (kept herein constant at mm), ii) their width (we consider five cases of mm, mm, mm, mm and mm), and iii) the number of discrete cells the inflatable part is divided into ( cells). The non-inflatable portion contains two mm-long areas at each side, used for attaching the actuators onto the body. The inflatable portion is the area in the middle and measures mm in length. Table II contains the 20 distinct actuator variants considered in this work.111This type of design can directly scale up to create larger actuators, e.g., targeted to older children. However, scaling down is determined by the available fabrication means to heat-seal the fabric (smaller actuators require thinner heat-sealed seams which may be achieved e.g., by low-heat precision-tip ironing) as well as its practical utility given the application context. For instance, as discussed later, actuators with more than four cells do not generate enough force required for the present application. Their main dimensions (importantly length and width) were informed by anthropometric data of the infant population reported in the literature. The upper arm length for male and female infants of 6-24 months of age varies on average between mm and mm, respectively [Fryar2021].

Fig. 1: Cross-section view of the proposed family of parameterized soft fabric-based pneumatic actuators considered in this work.
Types Cell Length (mm) Total length (mm) Width (5 cases)
1 Cell 152.40 254
2 Cell 76.20 254
3 Cell 50.80 254
4 Cell 38.10 254
* where mm
TABLE II: Key Actuator Design Parameters

Our proposed fabric-based actuators are lightweight, making them ideal for use in pediatric assistive and rehabilitation devices. Specifically, their weight varies between g for thinner ones and g for wider ones, which is a reduction of over compared to the silicone-based ones [Kokkoni2020_asme] that weigh about g each. Lightweight actuators result in smaller inertia and hence lower contact force and lower overall momentum, which is critical for safety.

Ii-B Feasibility Assessment in Simulation

The performance and design feasibility of the proposed family of actuator designs (Table II

) was first assessed through simulated experiments (SolidWorks; Dassault Systems, Waltham, MA). Simulations were used to estimate the stress, strain, deformation scale, and displacement, to identify actuator designs that can maximize the force output to be useful for arm abduction without failing. Simulated experiments serve as the basis to guide hardware development in the sense of filtering out some of the parametrization listed in Table 

II that are not expected to be physically viable.

Simulations used the TPU-coated nylon from the software’s material library with yield strength of . All components of the simulated actuators employed the shelling function on thick cells to create pockets within all the given actuators cells, which closely matches the height of the physical actuators. An outward pressure from within the cells against their inner surfaces was applied to find the maximum pressure up to which the actuators avoid functional failure.

Fig. 2: Effects of decreasing width for all actuators. Deformation scale, strain and stress increase but displacement decreases with smaller widths.
Fig. 3: Simulation for the shoulder actuators for various geometries i.e. decreasing the width from A (50.80mm) to E (38.10mm) () of Von Mises stress contour plots for stresses in 1 cell () and 2 cell (). As the width decreases, the von Mises value increases.

It can be seen in Fig. 2 the cell width is directly proportional to the amount of displacement, whereas the deformation scale and strain are inversely proportional. Furthermore, a decrease in cell width (from mm to mm) causes a critical error as von Mises values exceed the yield strength and strain is much higher (Fig. 3). To determine the optimal number of cells, note the increasing trend among number of cells, von Mises and strain. This suggests that actuators with fewer cells and higher width are expected to perform better.

Armed with this analysis, 1- and 2-cell actuators of the highest width (mm) were deemed to be most viable choices for shoulder abduction/adduction with lower chances of failure, and hence were also tested experimentally.

Iii Experimental Testing and Evaluation

Iii-a Experimental Setup

Inflation and deflation of the actuators were controlled using an-off body pneumatic control board (Programmable-Air—an open-source hardware kit to control inflatable soft robots). The board has two compressor/vacuum pumps and three pneumatic valves to control the airflow during inflation and deflation and weighs

kg (Fig. 6a). The pumps have a flow rate of lit/min. The Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) or the duty cycle of the pump can be varied from to , and although the pump may turn on around % duty cycle, the lower the duty cycle, the longer it will take to inflate/deflate. The board can create pressure varying between psi. An Arduino Nano (ATMega328P) connects the board to a computer via microUSB. This electro-pneumatics board is powered up using a 12V adapter. The board also has a pressure sensor (SMPP-03). After full inflation, if a certain internal pressure is reached, airflow automatically stops to prevent leakage and/or actuator damage.

For the physical experiments, the two down-selected actuator variants (1-cell and 2-cell actuators; Fig. 6b) were placed on a physical model scaled approximately to the 50th percentile of a 12-month-old infant’s upper body [Fryar2021] using velcro straps on the non-inflatable portions (Fig. 6a). The arm was linked to the torso through a 3-DOF ball-and-socket shoulder joint. Actuator placement was selected such that it can support shoulder abduction/adduction without hindering rotation about the other axes.

(a) The experimental setup with the actuator placed under the arm.
(b) 1-cell (left) and 2-cell (right) physical actuator prototypes at deflated state (top) and at full inflation (bottom).
Fig. 6: Physical experimentation setup and sample actuator prototypes.
(a) Shoulder during inflation of the 1-cell actuator. (b) Shoulder during deflation of the 1-cell actuator. (c) Shoulder during inflation of the 2-cell actuator. (d) Shoulder during deflation of the 2-cell actuator.
Fig. 11: Right arm’s end-effector X and Y position, and the two-dimensional trajectories (curves in red) during abduction and adduction for the 1- and 2-cell actuators. Curves in the top, middle and bottom row correspond to , and duty cycle, respectively.

In the experiments, different conditions were considered by varying i) the duty cycle of the pneumatic control board (, and ), and ii) the inflation/deflation times (sec in sec increments). Both actuators went through 30 trials of abduction and adduction for each condition. Video recordings from the experiments were used to extract the 2D position of the end-effector (indicated by a color marker Fig. 6(a)) of the arm (www.kinovea.org; v0.9.5). An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) (Xsens DOT; Xsens Technologies B.V., Enschede, The Netherlands) was placed at the end-effector to collect kinematic data (Euler angles, acceleration and velocity) at a sampling rate of Hz. Lastly, the force exerted by the arm was measured with the actuator powered on, using a four-wire load cell and HX711 amplifier.

To assess actuator performance we evaluated the end-effector’s: i) exerted force, ii) movement smoothness (using Spectral Arc length [SPARC] [Melendez2021]), and iii) motion path length, as well as the maximum angle achieved at the shoulder joint during abduction/adduction.

Iii-B Experimental Results and Discussion

To reach full inflation at duty cycle, it takes sec and sec on average for the 1-cell and 2-cell actuators, respectively. This suggests a roughly superlinear decrease of inflation time as PWM increases, for both actuators. Fig. 11 depicts the 2D position data of the end-effector during shoulder abduction and adduction for the 1-cell and 2-cell, respectively.

Iii-B1 Force Generation

Forces exerted by the end-effector under 1-cell and 2-cell actuators are shown in Fig. 12

. A two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify differences in force profiles between the two types of actuators and across the different duty cycles. A statistically significant interaction between number of cells and

duty cycle was found (, ) supporting that the number of cells has an effect on force generation at the and duty cycles but not at the . In the aforementioned two duty cycles, the 1-cell actuator is the one that produces greater forces. Overall, force generation increases with increasing duty cycle.

Fig. 12: The force exerted by the arm during full inflation for 1-cell (left) and 2-cell (right) shoulder actuators at , and duty cycle.

Iii-B2 Movement Smoothness

Two-way ANOVAs were performed to identify differences on smoothness across the two types of actuators and the different duty cycles, for each type of motion (abduction and adduction). For abduction, a significant interaction between number of cells and % duty cycle was found (, ) supporting the % duty cycle affects differently the performance of the two actuators. For adduction, a significant difference only for the main effect of % duty cycle was found (, ). Tukey post-hoc analysis showed that smoothness is significantly less at the 50% duty cycle compared to the other two regardless of the number of cells (, , ). Smoothness values along the axes (i.e. x, y and z) from IMU readings are shown in Table III.222 We used the continuous data streams of gyroscopic data collected in the IMU on a SPARC-based approach to quantitatively measure the movement smoothness [Melendez2021, Beck2018]. The adaptive cut-off frequency was determined to be from the signal power spectral density. The signals were low-pass filtered with a zero-lag second order Butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency at to remove the high-frequency noise.

width=center Movement Sample Duty cycle Smoothness (S)(Mean SD) 25pt. Sx Sy Sz Abduction 1 cell 50% 75% 100% 25pt. 2 cell 50% 75% 100% Adduction 1 cell 50% 75% 100% 25pt. 2 cell 50% 75% 100%

TABLE III: Smoothness (S) values

Iii-B3 Path Length and Shoulder Angle

Two-way ANOVAs were performed to identify differences on motion path length across the two types of actuators and the different duty cycles, for each type of motion (abduction and adduction). For abduction, a significant interaction between number of cells and duty cycles was found (, ) supporting that the duty cycle affects differently the performance of the two actuators. Similarly, for adduction, a significant interaction between number of cells and duty cycles was found (, ) supporting that the duty cycle affects differently the performance of the two actuators. Motion path profiles are depicted in Fig. 13.

As for the changes in angle at the shoulder joint, two observations can be pointed out. First, the range of motion on the vertical axis is greater with the 1-cell actuator compared to the 2-cell actuator. Second, the average maximum angle achieved with the 2-cell actuator at duty cycle is similar to the average maximum angle achieved with the 1-cell actuator at duty cycle, indicating that we can achieve higher elevation of the arm against gravity with the 1-cell actuator (Table IV).

Overall, the aforementioned findings inform next steps into the design and control (more information in [Mucchiani2022closed]) of our wearable device as well as considerations for its use. For example, although the 1-cell actuator achieves greater elevation of the arm and generates greater forces, comes with limitations that can be addressed with the 2-cell actuator. Fig. 11 and TableV present visual and quantitative (Coefficient of Variation [CV]) data that support a greater trial-to-trial variation in force generation and end-effector x,y position across every duty cycle for the 1-cell actuator that is not observed with the 2-cell actuator. In addition, as the 1-cell actuator achieves full inflation and leads to maximum joint angle, it protrudes from the underarm placement. The 2-cell actuator, on the other hand, remains in place throughout the inflation making it more low-profile for our wearable (Fig. 14).

Fig. 13: Motion path length of end-effector with 1-cell (left) and 2-cell (right) actuators at inflation (top) and deflation (bottom) across duty cycles.
Actuator Duty cycle Shoulder Angle (degree) (Mean SD)
1 cell 50%
75%
100%
2 cell 50%
75%
100%
TABLE IV: Shoulder Angle
Actuator Duty cycle Force Smoothness Path length
1 cell 50%
75%
100%
2 cell 50%
75%
100%
TABLE V: Coefficient of variation(CV)
Fig. 14: The actuators in deflated (top) and inflated (bottom) states. From left to right: 1-cell, 2-cell, and 1-cell actuator placed within a detachable double-layered pocket. Box in red indicates the housing space of the actuator in the pocket. The hook on the pocket connects with the loop on the wearable.

Iv Conclusion and Future Work

This paper demonstrates the design and evaluation of a family of new fabric-based actuators for the infant shoulder. Among 20 initially-proposed multi-cell designs first evaluated in simulation, two actuators (1-cell and 2-cell) were down-selected and tested on a physical infant-sized model. Overall, the 1-cell actuator seems to generate forces and arm motion that are appropriate for our application; nevertheless, trial-to-trial variation is less for the 2-cell actuator indicating a higher reproducibility. Although fabric-based actuators may come with limitations such as low force generation [Belforte2014], for our purpose (i.e. use with infants), we found these forces adequate to lift the arms against gravity. Future work will focus on supporting other UE joints, developing closed-loop controllers [Mucchiani2022closed], and eventually testing with infants.

References