-
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliograp...
05/21/2020 ∙ by Martijn Visser, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Algorithmic labeling in hierarchical classifications of publications: Evaluation of bibliographic fields and term weighting approaches
Algorithmic classifications of research publications can be used to stud...
04/17/2020 ∙ by Peter Sjögårde, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus
We present a large-scale analysis of the accuracy of citation data in th...
06/17/2019 ∙ by Nees Jan van Eck, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
A multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications
The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one...
01/28/2019 ∙ by Yi Bu, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
A multidimensional perspective on the citation impact of scientific publications
The citation impact of scientific publications is usually seen as a one-...
01/28/2019 ∙ by Yi Bu, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications
There are many different relatedness measures, based for instance on cit...
01/21/2019 ∙ by Ludo Waltman, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Intermediacy of publications
Citation networks of scientific publications offer fundamental insights ...
12/19/2018 ∙ by Lovro Šubelj, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF
When performing a national research assessment, some countries rely on c...
08/10/2018 ∙ by Vincent Traag, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Exploration of Reproducibility Issues in Scientometric Research Part 2: Conceptual Reproducibility
This is the second part of a small-scale explorative study in an effort ...
04/13/2018 ∙ by Theresa Velden, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research Part 1: Direct reproducibility
This is the first part of a small-scale explorative study in an effort t...
04/13/2018 ∙ by Ludo Waltman, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Analyzing the activities of visitors of the Leiden Ranking website
The CWTS Leiden Ranking (www.leidenranking.com) provides bibliometric in...
04/11/2018 ∙ by Nees Jan van Eck, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Field normalization of scientometric indicators
When scientometric indicators are used to compare research units active ...
01/30/2018 ∙ by Ludo Waltman, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis
We report characteristics of in-text citations in over five million full...
10/09/2017 ∙ by Kevin W. Boyack, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Co-Citation Levels
We investigate the similarities of pairs of articles which are co-cited ...
07/10/2017 ∙ by Giovanni Colavizza, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be wrong
Most scientometricians reject the use of the journal impact factor for a...
03/07/2017 ∙ by Ludo Waltman, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer
Clustering scientific publications in an important problem in bibliometr...
02/11/2017 ∙ by Nees Jan van Eck, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
