AI Chat AI Image Generator AI Video Text to Speech

Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning

02/06/2013

∙

by Jens Doerpmund, et al.

∙

∙

Poole has shown that nonmonotonic logics do not handle the lottery paradox correctly. In this paper we will show that Pollock's theory of defeasible reasoning fails for the same reason: defeasible reasoning is incompatible with the skeptical notion of derivability.

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research

∙ 03/27/2013

Nonmonotonic Reasoning via Possibility Theory

We introduce the operation of possibility qualification and show how. th...

0 Ronald R. Yager, et al. ∙

research

∙ 07/22/2019

An Algebraic Approach for Action Based Default Reasoning

Often, we assume that an action is permitted simply because it is not ex...

0 Pablo F. Castro, et al. ∙

research

∙ 02/27/2013

Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism ...

0 Sek-Wah Tan, et al. ∙

research

∙ 05/10/2021

Budget-Constrained Coalition Strategies with Discounting

Discounting future costs and rewards is a common practice in accounting,...

0 Lia Bozzone, et al. ∙

research

∙ 01/02/2020

Rethinking Defeasible Reasoning: A Scalable Approach

Recent technological advances have led to unprecedented amounts of gener...

0 Michael J. Maher, et al. ∙

research

∙ 05/09/2000

Reasoning with Axioms: Theory and Pratice

When reasoning in description, modal or temporal logics it is often usef...

0 Ian Horrocks, et al. ∙

research

∙ 03/27/2013

Conditioning on Disjunctive Knowledge: Defaults and Probabilities

Many writers have observed that default logics appear to contain the "lo...

0 Eric Neufeld, et al. ∙